Joint Program in Nuclear Medicine
Scintigraphic Evaluation of FUO in Patients with Tumors
Justine Arthur, BMBS, BMedSci, MRCP
Annick Van den Abbeele, MD
October 24, 1995
Presentation
A 64-year old man presented with a pathological fracture of the
proximal left humerus secondary to high grade chondrosarcoma. Staging
workup including abdominal and chest computed tomography and bone scan
revealed a small nodule in the left mid lung but no other evidence of
metastasis. He underwent successful resection of the tumor, repair
of the defect with an allograft and latissimus dorsi flap, followed by
5000 rad of radiation treatment to the tumor bed for local control
and palliation of his pain.
Three months later he presented with left lateral chest wall pain
following a fall. Chest CT and plain films showed a left lateral
pleural based mass and bilateral small lung nodules.
Bone scan (48k bytes) showed three discrete foci
of increased tracer uptake in the left 8th, 9th and 10th ribs
anteriorly. Correlative radiographs did not reveal any bony lesions;
specifically, no fractures were seen. In view of the aggressive
progressive nature of his disease, it was decided to proceed with
palliative MAID chemotherapy (mesna, adriamycin, ifosfamide and
dacarbazine) for the sarcoma.
He had a history of fever for four
weeks. On admission, his temperature was 101
degrees F with no localizing signs or symptoms. The infection
screen including blood, urine and sputum cultures, hepatobiliary
scintigraphy (to rule out acute cholecystitis) and echocardiography
(to rule out bacterial endocarditis) was negative. Laboratory results
included a hemoglobin of 9.3g/dl and WBC count of 6,600
cells/microlitre, with 13% lymphocytes, 19% monocytes and 58%
polymorphonuclear cells. Subsequently, a Tc-99m-labeled white cell
study was ordered to look for an occult source of infection prior to
commencing chemotherapy.
Imaging Technique
Routine in vitro labelling of autologous white cells was performed
with Tc-99m hexamethylpropyleneamine oxine (HMPAO). The patient was
injected with 9.7 mCi of Tc-99m HMPAO labeled leukocytes.
Imaging Findings
Planar images of the Tc-99m-labeled white cell study (81k bytes) obtained one
hour after injection revealed markedly abnormal patchy uptake
throughout the bone marrow. There was normal hepatic and splenic
uptake and no collections of tracer to suggest a focus of infection
outside the reticuloendothelial system. Residual bowel activity in
the right lower quadrant of the abdomen due to the Tc-99m-DISIDA
hepatobiliary scan performed 20 hours earlier was noted prior to
reinjection of the autologous labeled white cells. A suggestion was
made that this pattern may reflect bone marrow replacement by tumor
cells and MRI correlation was recommended.
MRI study (70k bytes) revealed diffusely decreased T1 signal in all the thoracic spine
vertebral bodies, ribs and sternum and foci of increased T2 signal
intensity scattered throughout the vertebral bodies consistent with
bone marrow expansion, myeloproliferative disease or diffuse
metastatic involvement. Together, the Tc-99m-labeled white cell
study and the MRI suggested diffuse metastatic marrow
involvement.
Clinical Course:
Without an identifiable source of infection,
the patient was started on the planned palliative MAID
chemotherapy regime. During his treatment however, his
aggressive disease continued to progress with the development of
brain metastases. The patient died before completing his
therapy.
Diagnosis
Bone Marrow Replacement
Discussion
Tc-99m-HMPAO labeled leukocyte scintigraphy is an
effective way of identifying sites of infection and has an overall
accuracy for detection of infection similar to In-111 labeled
leukocytes (92% accuracy for Tc-99m-HMPAO and 88% for In-111)(1). The
theoretical advantages of labeling with Tc-99m are:
- lower radiation dosimetry of Tc-99m compared with In-111 allowing
administration of higher doses of activity (10 mCi Tc-99m-HMPAO
compared with 500 uCi of In-111),
- higher photon yield of Tc-99m,
- optimal imaging characteristics of Tc-99m for gamma cameras, and
- since the sensitivity of
Tc-99m leukocyte imaging is near maximal by 30 minutes, the study
may be completed within 2 hours.
Radiopharmaceuticle:
Tc-99m-HMPAO is lipophilic and readily crosses the white cell membrane
where it becomes trapped by binding to the mitochondria and nucleus.
As it has a predilection for granulocytes, an almost pure granulocyte
preparation is obtained without the need for separation of
granulocytes from the buffy coat layer. The normal biodistribution
of Tc-99m-HMPAO-labeled leukocytes includes:
- liver,
- spleen and bone marrow,
- kidneys and bladder (may be visualized as early as 1 hour,
- intestines due to excretion of a
secondary complex via the gallbladder (visualized in 4% by one hour,
and increasing thereafter(2)), and
- lung uptake due to capillary
trapping is seen early, but decreases significantly by 4 hours.
Fever of Unknown Origin:
Assessment of a fever of unknown origin (defined as the cyclical
persistence of a fever over a period of 3 weeks or more), often
leads to "infection
imaging" to identify the occult source of infection. Techniques
available for imaging infection include gallium-67 citrate,
indium-111 labeled leukocytes and technetium-99m labeled leukocytes.
Other promising agents currently still in clinical trials include
radiolabelled polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies, and labeled
chemotactic peptides. In patients who have not had recent surgery,
Ga-67 may be the most sensitive test for identifying the source of
fever as Ga-67 may uncover not only acute and chronic infection, but
also granulomatous disease (including tuberculosis) and tumor.
In fact, 20% of patients who have fever of unknown origin have occult
neoplasms(3).
For patients who have a shorter duration of non-localizing fever,
in whom more acute infection with a higher probability of neutrophil
infiltration is suspected, labeled leukocytes have shown good results
and allow more rapid diagnosis than with gallium. In 8 different
series, the sensitivity and specificity for detecting infection with
Tc-99m leukocytes varied between 90-100% and 89-100% respectively,
whilst in 5 other series the sensitivity and specificity of Ga-67
citrate for infection varied between 81-94% and 64-100%
respectively(4). In addition, for those cases where intra-abdominal
sepsis is suspected, In-111 labeled leukocytes are preferred as,
unlike Ga-67 citrate and Tc-99m labeled leukocytes, there is no bowel
excretion to confound the interpretation.
Fever Assessment in Patients with Tumor:
The assessment of fever in a patient with known tumor, however, poses
particular problems as the fever may be due to tumor, chemotherapy,
infection or an inflammatory lesion. In addition, patients undergoing
chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy are frequently leukopenic. If
localizing symptoms are present, computed tomography or
ultrasonography are indicated to evaluate the focus of infection. If
no localizing signs are present, whole body imaging in search of an
occult focus of infection is indicated particularly if, as in the
present case, the patient is due to commence therapy that has the
potential to significantly impair the immune response to infection.
As many tumors are gallium avid, false positive results for foci of
infection or inflammation may occur and so labeled-leukocyte studies
are more helpful.
A study comparing Ga-67 citrate scans with In-111 labeled leukocytes
in 10 febrile patients with known tumor found, not surprisingly, that
specificity for infection was higher with the labeled white cells
than with Ga-67 citrate and also concluded that normal findings on
Ga-67 citrate and labeled leukocyte scans indicated tumor-chemotherapy
fever(5). Labeled leukocyte studies however require a leukocyte count
above 5000/mm3 for optimal imaging (although diagnostic imaging can be
successfully performed with counts as low as 3000/mm3). Although
cross matched donor leukocytes have been successfully used, Ga-67
citrate imaging is preferable in neutropenic patients.
Antibodies:
Recent studies of Tc-99m- or I-123-labeled murine monoclonal
antigranulocytic antibodies and In-111- or Tc-99m-labeled polyclonal
human immunoglobulin G (IgG) have yielded favorable results in
infection imaging and are of particular interest as, in contrast to
labeling leukocytes, these techniques do not require ex vivo labeling
and handling of blood products(6-9). One disadvantage of Tc-99m-labeled
monoclonal antibody, which is directed against non-specific
cross-reacting antigen (NCA-95, a differentiation antigen of
granulopoiesis) (10) is that the antibody
appears to label bone marrow myelocytic series to a greater degree
than it labels peripheral granulocytes. This particular propertyhas
led to recent interest in using labeled antigranulocyte antibody
(AGA) as a marrow imaging agent in the assessment for bone marrow
metastases(11-14). Several studies have reported higher detection of
marrow metastases with Tc-99m-labeled AGA compared with bone scans
(78% vs. 53% in breast cancer (11); 32% vs. 10% for breast, 18% vs. 12%
for prostate, 11% vs. 5% for lung and 3.6% vs. 1.5% for kidney and
bladder (14) and more conventional colloid marrow scintigraphy. Using
Tc-99m-labeled AGA, bone marrow scans of superior quality compared
with colloid scans have been obtained, as hepatic and splenic AGA
uptake is significantly
lower whilst hematopoietic marrow uptake is 2-4 times higher.
This may prove to be clinically useful in the early detection of bone
marrow metastatic invasion.
A drawback of murine monoclonal
antibodies, however, is the immunogenicity of intact murine
antibodies, limiting the possibility of repeat administrations
because of changes in the biodistribution secondary to immune complex
formation. Transient HAMA (human antimurine antibodies) responses
have been detected in between 5% and 40% of patients after monoclonal
antigranulocytic
antibody scintigraphy(15,16,17). However, no allergic reactions have
been observed in patients reinjected up to 3 times(15).
Marrow Replacement:
For the index patient, the abnormal uptake of Tc-99m labeled leukocytes
throughout the bone marrow was very similar to patterns documented in
diffuse metastatic disease imaged with Tc-99m-labeled AGA(11).
In addition, similar to findings with labeled AGA, Tc-99m-labeled
leukocytes, in this case, were more sensitive than the bone scan in
identifying diffuse skeletal metastatic involvement. In fact, the
first indication of widespread marrow involvement, which came as a
surprise to the referring clinicians in this particular patient, was
the abnormal marrow uptake on the leukocyte study performed as an
infection screen. Diffuse marrow invasion was subsequently confirmed
by MRI, the fever was attributed to the underlying carcinomatosis and
he was commenced on chemotherapy despite his poor prognosis.
Conclusions:
Tc-99m-labeled leukocytes are an effective way of imaging infection
with a sensitivity ranging from 90-100% and specificity ranging from
89-100% in various series. In febrile patients with known tumor and
with fever of unknown origin, labeled leukocyte scans are preferred
over Ga-67 citrate, to help differentiate between fever due to the
underlying tumor or due to infection or inflammation. In the
index case, the Tc-99m labeled leukocyte scan not only helped
rule out an occult infection, it also identified "occult" widespread
metastatic skeletal involvement which had not been appreciated on the
prior staging bone scan.
References
1. Kipper SL and Evans D. Simultaneous In-111-oxine and Tc-99m-HMPAO leukocyte
imaging in a community hospital. (Abstract). J Nucl Med 1992;33:902
2. Thrall JH and Ziessman HA. Infection and inflammation. In Nuclear Medicine
- The Requisites. 1995,Mosby-Year Book, Inc pps:149-169.
3. Alazraki NP Radionuclide imaging in the evaluation of infections and
inflammatory disease. Radiol Clin North America 1993;31:783-794
4. Bester MJ, Van Heerden PDR, Klopper JF et al. Imaging infection and
inflammation in an African environment: Comparison of
Tc99m-HMPAO-labelled leukocytes and Ga-67 citrate. Nucl Med
Commun 1995;16:599-607.
5. Palestro CJ, Fineman DS, Needle LB et al. Utility of In-111 labeled autologous
leukocytes and Ga-67 citrate imaging in patients with tumour {abstract}.
Radiology 1987;165:73.
6. Lind P, Langsteger W, Koltringer P et al. Immunoscintigraphy of inflammatory
processes with a Tc-99m-labeled monoclonal antigranulocyte antibody (MAb BW
250/183). J Nucl Med 1990;31:417-423
7. Becker w, Goldenberg DM and Wolf F. The use of monoclonal antibodies and
antibody fragments in the imaging of infectious lesions. Semin Nucl Med
1994;24:142-153.
8. Rubin RH, Fischman AJ, Callahan RJ et al. Indium-11-labeled nonspecific
immunoglobulin scanning in the detection of focal infection. N Engl J Med
1989;321:935-940.
9. Rubin RH and Fischman AJ. The use of radiolabeled nonspecific immunoglobulin in
the detection of focal inflammation. Semin Nucl Med 1994;24:169-179.
10. Reske SN. Recent advances in bone marrow imaging. Eur J Nucl Med
1991;18:203-221
11. Duncker CM, Carrio I, Berna L et al. Radioimmune imaging of bone marrow in
patients with suspected bone metastases from primary breast cancer. J Nucl
Med 1990;31(9):1450-14558
12. Lee KH, Chung J-K, Choi CW et al. Tc-99m-labelled antigranulocyte antibody
bone marrow scintigraphy. J Nucl Med 1995;36:1800-1805.
13. Reske SN, Karsten JH, Gloeckner W et al. Radioimmunoimaging for diagnosis
for bone marrow involvement in breast cancer and malignant lymphoma.
Lancet Feb1989:299-301
14. Munz DL, Sandrock D and Rilinger N. Comparison of immunoscintigraphy
and colloid scintigraphy of bone marrow. Lancet Jul 1990:258-259.
15. Reske SN, Sohn M, Karstens JH et al. Immunoscintigraphy of bone marrow with
Tc-99m labelled NCA-95/CEA antibodies (TcNAA). Comparison with bone
scanning, plain radiographs and HAMA-response (abstract). J Nucl Med
1990;31:751.
16. Joseph K, Hoffken H, Bosslet K et al. In vivo labelling of granulocytes with Tc-
99m-anti-NCA monoclonal antibodies for imaging inflammation. Eur J Nucl Med
1988; 14:367-373.
17. Abdel-Nabi H, Doerr R, Roth SC et al. Recurrent colorectal cancer detection with
repeated infusions of indium-111 ZCE-025 MoAb. J Nucl Med 1989;30:748.
Click here to go
to Joint Program in Nuclear Medicine home page and Copyright
notice.
J. Anthony Parker, MD PhD, Tony_Parker@bidmc.harvard.edu